Our Recent Appeal Cases

Murder Exoneration

Commonwealth v. I.S.

This was a case that involved a robbery conviction related to one victim and a separate second-degree murder conviction that related to a different victim, both resulting in a sentence of thirty years to life imprisonment. Our client was a seventeen-year old female who was wrongfully convicted based on an illegally coerced confession elicited from her by a now-exposed corrupt detective; false testimony from another juvenile, and fatally flawed identification testimony from two eyewitnesses. During the course of this PCRA litigation, which spanned over four years, we engaged the Conviction Integrity Unit of the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office.

Our firm uncovered and presented cell-phone records that established an alibi for our client, presented alibi testimony at one of several PCRA hearings; presented favorable evidence that the prosecution failed to disclose at the time of trial; and comprehensively and definitively refuted each piece of “evidence” that was used to convict our client. After nearly thirteen years of incarceration, our client’s convictions were vacated and she is now home with her family.

Extensive details about this case are detailed in the chronicles of the National Registry of Exonerations, found at https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/casedetail.aspx?caseid=6545.

Mr. Mosser’s Post Hearing Brief can be reviewed here: Download PDF.

Media coverage of this case can be found here: www.audacy.com/kywnewsradio/news/local/india-spellman-free-2013-murder-conviction-dismissed

and here: https://www.inquirer.com/news/india-spellman-exoneration-philadelphia-da-larry-krasner-wrongful-conviction-20230209.html

Right to Counsel of Choice

Commonwealth v. N.L.

In this highly publicized case, our client was alleged to have fired multiple rounds from a semi-automatic rifle at several police officers during a lengthy armed standoff. During the confrontation, several officers were audio recorded as having mocked our client and encouraging him to commit suicide. Our client’s first lawyer improperly released these recordings to the media, and because of this misconduct, was removed from representing our client against his
wishes. Our client was subsequently convicted of several counts of attempted murder and aggravated assault and sentenced to 28 1/2 to 57 years incarceration.

Our firm was hired to litigate the appeal, and we successfully argued that our client’s constitutional right to retain the lawyer of his choosing was violated, thus causing a structural error in the trial. After our briefing and Mr. Mosser’s presentation of oral argument, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania reversed our client’s convictions. The Court’s published opinion can be found here: Download PDF

Financial Fraud Lawsuit

DYKWYPA, et al, v. MLPFS

In this federal civil lawsuit, Mr. Mosser represented a number of plaintiffs who sued a large broker-dealer for fraud, conversion, and breach of fiduciary duty related to the mishandling of the clients’ funds.  After having successfully argued for punitive damages to be permissible in this case, the matter settled on the eve of trial for an amount that was over four times the client’s actual damages. 

Tell us about your case

Frequently Asked Questions

What does a Pennsylvania appeals lawyer do?

A Pennsylvania appeals lawyer reviews trial errors, court rulings, sentencing issues, and legal mistakes to challenge a conviction or judgment. Learn more about criminal appeals.

A PCRA petition allows a convicted person to challenge a case after trial or appeal due to issues like ineffective counsel, constitutional violations, or new evidence. See PCRA representation.

Yes. If a trial lawyer failed to investigate, call key witnesses, give correct advice, or protect legal rights, it may support post-conviction relief.

Character evidence can help show a defendant’s reputation for peacefulness, honesty, or law-abiding behavior, especially in credibility-based cases. See Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence 404.

Yes. A conviction may be reversed or vacated if trial counsel made serious errors, self-defense evidence was mishandled, or the defendant’s rights were violated.

If incorrect legal advice caused you to waive your right to testify, it may become a strong PCRA issue. A post-conviction lawyer can review the trial record.

It is a case based mainly on one person’s accusation and another person’s denial. In these cases, witness credibility and character evidence can be critical.

An appeals attorney can review the record, identify legal errors, file appellate briefs, and seek a new trial, reduced sentence, or other relief.

You should act quickly and speak with a PCRA lawyer because post-conviction deadlines are strict. Start with the firm’s appeals process guide.

A bank may face legal claims if it ignored unusual activity, large withdrawals, suspicious wires, or signs of elder financial exploitation.

Elder financial exploitation occurs when someone uses scams, pressure, fraud, or deception to take money or assets from an older adult. See Pennsylvania elder financial exploitation resources.

FINRA rules can apply when financial firms fail to respond properly to suspected exploitation involving older or vulnerable clients. See FINRA Rule 2165.

You can contact Mosser Legal to discuss a criminal appeal, PCRA petition, civil appeal, or financial fraud matter. Visit the contact page.

Call Now Button